Petition for Immediate Ex Parte Temporary Injunction
Roland seeks an emergency injunction and alleges harassment and stalking. These are allegations, not adjudicated facts.
SHUT HER UP · COURT RECORDS
Roland v. Byrd
Dustin Roland sought an immediate injunction on September 25, 2026. The court entered an ex parte order September 29. Katie Byrd challenged that order through a motion filed October 8. The docket records an October 15 injunction hearing but not a disposition in the supplied snapshot.
Court CasesRoland v. Byrd
Primary sources and allegations: These are court filings, not endorsements of the allegations they contain. Docket-only entries are explicitly labeled and do not have PDF links.
Record cutoff: Docket snapshot supplied through October 16, 2026. Later activity may not appear here.
CaseCVCV071818
PlaintiffDustin Roland
Latest listed proceedingOct 15 hearing
Docket chronology
Filings & court documents
The filing dates below are drawn from the court stamps or the supplied docket. The original public PDF can be read in a preview or opened directly; download links remain available.
Affidavit in Support of Petition
Roland describes alleged social-media posts, location references, and workplace contacts in a sworn statement.
Amendment Regarding Bond
Plaintiff addresses the temporary-injunction bond and requests that it be set at $500.
Order Granting Immediate Ex Parte Temporary Injunction
Court order imposing restrictions on contact, discussion, publication, and takedown of references to Roland, subject to posting a $500 bond.
Cash Bond Posted
Docket records a $500 cash bond posted for the temporary injunction.
No PDF is offered here until it has been independently reviewed and prepared for publication.
Return of Service
The docket records personal service of Byrd on September 29, 2026.
No PDF is offered here until it has been independently reviewed and prepared for publication.
Motion to Dissolve, Vacate, or Modify
Byrd asks the court to dissolve the injunction or narrow its scope to unlawful conduct, preserving lawful expression. Public copy redacts residential address and phone only.
Order Setting Hearing
Court schedules a hearing on the motion to dissolve for October 15, 2026, at 1:30 p.m.
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion
Roland opposes modification, requests further permanent-injunction proceedings, and states an intention to pursue a contempt application. A stated intention is not an entered contempt finding.
Court Reporter Memorandum and Certificate
Docket entry recorded October 16 references the October 15 injunction hearing before Judge Jason Walke. No outcome is stated in the provided docket snapshot.
No PDF is offered here until it has been independently reviewed and prepared for publication.
What comes next
The record remains open
The October 9 scheduling order identified a hearing on the motion to dissolve. The reporter memorandum entered October 16 confirms an October 15 injunction proceeding before Judge Jason Walke, but the docket snapshot does not state how the motion was resolved. The October 12 response requests a permanent-injunction hearing and refers to a contemplated contempt application; those requests and intentions must not be described as granted or filed absent additional docket evidence.
See the other lawsuit
These are separate proceedings. Read the Sciorrotta v. Byrd record, or return to both cases.